Vi IQ for a crypto pair: one score, six domains, all shown
A single market score is only trustworthy if you can take it apart. Vi IQ is a 0–100 research score over six named domains, and this page publishes the aggregate together with every domain value, how many of them reported, and which inputs the source flagged as stale — so a high score built on two live domains cannot be mistaken for a high score built on six.
Vi IQ research score and domains
The current published research score for BTC on the major spot venues, with each of the six domains.
Observed · Stale
| Domain | Score |
|---|---|
| Overall research score | 56 |
| Market quality | 100 |
| Liquidity health | 92 |
| Order flow | 46 |
| Arbitrage potential | 0 |
| Volatility | 5 |
| News and attention | 93 |
What you can do with it
Read the domains before the aggregate
The interesting information is almost always in the spread between domains: a pair can look strong overall while its order-flow domain is weak, and that combination means something different from a uniformly average score.
Check how many domains reported
The coverage line states how many of the six had inputs. A score computed from partial coverage is still a score, but it is a narrower claim, and it is written on the page rather than implied.
Treat a stale input as a caveat, not a value
When the source marks an input stale, the note says so and names it. The aggregate can still include a retained value; knowing which one lets you decide whether the score is telling you about the market or about a feed.
Use the score to choose where to look
In the app, Vi IQ sits beside the chart, the book and the whale views for the selected pair. Its job is triage: which pair to open, not what to do when you get there.
How it works
The six domains
Market quality, liquidity health, order flow, arbitrage potential, volatility and news sentiment. Each is scored on its own inputs and shown on its own row, so the aggregate is a summary of things you can inspect rather than a black box with a number on it.
In the app the score is shown with a verdict word — from Strong opportunity through Neutral to Avoid — and clamped to a 1–100 range. The verdict is a label for a band, not a prediction, and the domain breakdown is what makes it auditable.
What the score is not
It is a heuristic research score, not a calibrated probability, not a forecast, and not measured investment performance. Nothing in it estimates the chance that a trade makes money, and there is no historical accuracy claim attached to it because none has been established.
It is also pair-specific and venue-specific. A score for BTC on the major spot venues says nothing about a thin altcoin pair, and the published research-pack score can use a different input set from any individual pair score in the app.
One name, two metrics
There is a second thing called Vi IQ in the trader tables, and it is a different measure: an activity score built from recent taker recency, volume, fill count and market breadth, described in the app as descriptive rather than a return forecast. The two are not comparable and should never be averaged. The Vi IQ page sets out both definitions side by side.
Why the breakdown is the product, not the score
A single number is easy to act on and impossible to check. The reason every domain is printed is that it turns the score from an assertion into a summary: you can see which parts are carrying it, which are missing, and whether the combination makes sense for what you are trying to do.
In practice the aggregate is most useful as a sort key across pairs and least useful as a judgement about one. Two pairs at the same value can be at that value for opposite reasons, and the domain rows are where that difference lives.
This is also why coverage is printed. A score that reports fewer than all its domains has not failed; it has answered a narrower question, and the honest way to present that is to say how many answered rather than to normalise the gap away.
What each plan gives you here
What a plan changes on this surface.
| What you get | Free | Essential | Premium | Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vi IQ headline score on the selected pair | Included | Included | Included | Included |
| Six-domain Vi IQ detail on every pair | Not included | Included | Included | Included |
| The tables on this site, as JSON and CSV | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Compared with the other named scores
Named metrics are a common pattern in this market — a copy score, a smart-money index, an insider rating — and most of them publish a number without a breakdown, which makes the number impossible to check and easy to overweight. The distinction here is not that Vi IQ is better; it is that every domain, the coverage count and the stale-input list are printed next to it.
Competitor details last checked . They describe other products as their operators published them, not as an assessment of them.
Questions
What does Vi IQ measure?
Six domains of crypto market condition — market quality, liquidity health, order flow, arbitrage potential, volatility and news sentiment — combined into one 0–100 research score, with every domain shown.
Is a high Vi IQ a buy signal?
No. It is a research signal about market conditions, not a recommendation, and it carries no claim about returns. Nothing on Vultax is financial advice.
Is Vi IQ available for prediction markets?
The six-domain score is for crypto pairs. The published data packs also carry a score for other subjects, and the trader tables carry a differently-defined activity score of the same name. Read the definition attached to the number you are looking at.
Where is it calculated?
Upstream of the interface. The app and this website display and normalise a published score; neither of them computes it, and the method identifier travels with the figure.
Which plan shows the domains?
The headline score on a selected pair is on the free tier. The six-domain detail on every pair sits on Essential and above. This page is free to read either way.
What happens when a source fails?
The table marks itself and names the failed or stale inputs in its notes. Values are not recalculated or relabelled as current when an input goes stale.
Does the score change with my plan?
No. A plan changes how much of the breakdown you can see in the app. The value itself is the same for everyone, and the published one on this page is the same figure.
Coverage and methodology
- Public tables mirror existing Vultax source packs. They do not include account data, private watchlists or the complete app dataset.
- Source time, coverage and limitations apply to each table. Missing values are unavailable, not zero.
Published research behind this page
Dated write-ups of the same sources. A figure in a study describes the window it was written about, not the snapshot above.
Order-book feed latency on 16 crypto exchanges: medians from 35.0 ms (Coinbase) to 111.5 ms (BTSE), a 95th percentile of 288–590 ms on every venue, and data in every minute of the day. Plus the coverage check that catches a feed that stays connected and stores almost nothing.
Original Vultax research: in an experimental test, a calibrated fair-value model beat raw Polymarket prices by ~9.6% on held-out Brier score. Where the favorite-longshot effect lives, what the model can honestly flag, and why it still isn't a trading edge.
Keep reading
Take this into the workspace
The published score and its domains are free to read here. Essential adds the six-domain detail on every pair inside the app.
A free account needs no payment card and starts no subscription. Figures on this page were observed . JSON · Markdown · Schema